A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO THE NEW MDA RULES
YOU ARE HERE: HOME / BLOG / A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE TO THE NEW MDA RULES
A comprehensive guide to the new MDA rules

A comprehensive guide to the new MDA rules

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has recently changed

the rules governing Managed Discretionary Accounts (MDAs) in Class Order

2016/968 and updated its guidance in Regulatory Guide 179 Managed Discretionary

Accounts (RG 179).

 

After a three-year wait, advisers who offer MDAs or are thinking of doing so, now

have clear direction.

 

“The new requirements are balanced. They take into account the need to protect

clients’ interests and at the same time recognise the variety of ways in which MDA

services are offered,” says Claire Wivell Plater, managing director of The Fold Legal,

a specialist law firm that advises clients on financial services regulation. She’s

pleased ASIC has taken industry concerns into account in the design of the changes.

New licensing requirements for ‘limited’ MDA providers are the most significant

change. Advisers who have been operating managing discretionary accounts within

a regulated platform without holding a specific licence authorisation will need to

apply for one.

 

“The good news is there's a two year transition period for this. During this time,

although advisers will need to demonstrate they have the required relevant skills,

experience and training, ASIC will recognise experience gained from operating an

MDA within a platform. That's very important, because it provides continuity for

advisers and their clients,” she adds.

 

Practical implications

 

Wivell Plater warns advisers the process for applying for an authorisation to offer

client’s MDAs is rigorous and involved. Aside from applying for the license, advisers

will need to demonstrate they can comply with the MDA requirements.

 

To do this, they will need to carefully document their MDA policies and procedures

and review their disclosure documents to ensure they comply with the new

requirements. “ASIC’s new approach is to ask for copies of some of these materials

so they can form their own view about the likelihood of compliance. So advisers

need to be ready,” she says.

 

Additional disclosures will be required in financial services guides (FSG), and MDA

contracts and investment programs will require new content. “Because the FSG

disclosures are detailed and complex, our suggestion to clients is to have two FSGs,

a standard FSG that covers their non-MDA services and a supplementary MDA

FSG. The supplementary document can be given to clients when advisers know

they’re likely to recommend an MDA service,” she says.

 

The changes also mean advice practices that offer MDAs will need to ensure they

have robust practices to manage actual and potential conflicts of interest. Wivell

Plater suggests appropriately managing conflict of interest risk involves a number of

considerations.

Most importantly, advisers must ensure any decisions to recommend an MDA

service are made objectively following an assessment of whether an MDA is

appropriate for the client. Providing an in-house service such as an MDA service can

generate more income for advisers who generally charge additional fees for

managing clients’ investments on a discretionary basis.

 

Therefore, under the best interest’s duty, the onus is on advisers not to recommend

an MDA unless there is an additional benefit for the client. This needs to be

assessed objectively.

 

Wivell Plater says ASIC’s guidance on managing conflicts of interest is practical and

helpful. ASIC suggests MDA operators appoint an independent investment

committee to make investment decisions, and that these decisions are approved by

a compliance officer before being implemented. Systems should be established to

create alerts if the investment committee's parameters are breached.

 

“The investment parameters should be set out in an investment policy which can be

used as a governance mechanism. The policy could establish rules for, for example,

acceptable asset allocations, trading frequencies and the use of unlimited recourse

financial instruments.”

 

Avoiding conflicts

 

Another ASIC recommendation is for advisers to flag potentially conflicted

transactions and subject these to an additional level of approval.

 

Wivell Plater explains the regulator expects advice practices to have information

barriers that insulate advisers who make discretionary investment decisions from

information that could give rise to conflicts.

 

“So if there is an in-house benefit from an investment, the idea is to ensure advisers

aren't aware of it, so they can’t unduly promote an investment that's in the licensee’s

interests,” she explains.

 

According to Wivell Plater, ASIC also expects practices to have arrangements to

automatically suspend their discretionary authority in certain circumstances. This

would include unexpected events such as significant market dislocations.

 

Additionally, ASIC has said advisers must obtain specific client consent before

trading unlimited recourse products such as contracts-for-difference on a

discretionary basis. Wivell Plater says this won’t affect most practices.

 

“It takes expertise to trade these instruments on a discretionary basis. Advisers who

do this need to make the client aware of the risks in the FSG and MDA contract and

get their specific consent,” she notes.

 

ASIC has decided not to introduce any new financial requirements for practices that

offer MDAs. It was considering introducing a net tangible assets condition similar to

those that apply to managed investment schemes and custodians, but has decided

to defer this until after the impact of the other MDA changes can be assessed, i.e. for

at least 2 years.

On top of this, MDA operators are still required to have $5 million in insurance cover.

 

Industry impact

 

According to Wivell Plater, the changes are likely to be a positive for platforms.

“Over the past few years, in response to heightened demand for MDAs, a number of

platforms have created bulk trading facilities so practices can implement a bulk

change across all clients’ portfolios with one rolled up trade. This avoids having to go

into each client's portfolio individually to effect the change. These platforms are well

placed to assist advisers to operate MDAs,” she adds.

 

Some platforms also offer investment committees and model portfolios. So advisers

who don't have the capacity to establish their own investment committees can work

with the platform’s capabilities.

 

On the other hand, the new requirements will require more focus on custodial

arrangements. MDA providers who delegate custody must ensure the custodian and

their sub-custodians satisfy rigorous standards when holding clients’ assets on

trusts; most particularly, holding them separately from other property and keeping

meticulous records of ownership.

 

“That will require written agreements about what the custodian can and cannot do,”

says Wivell Plater.

 

The agreement must give MDA providers the right to review, monitor and give

instructions to the custodian and any sub custodian. It must prevent custodians from

taking security interests such as a mortgage or lien over clients’ assets, even to

secure payment of their fees. And custodians must agree to be liable to the MDA

provider and clients about any losses that might be caused by the custodian's acts or

omissions.

 

The custodian must also certify at least once every 13 months it has met the

agreement’s terms and minimum standards. This means advisers must have much

more robust selection, contracting and monitoring obligations in relation to an

external custodian. However, this really just brings the custodial requirements for

MDAs in line with other custodial arrangements.

 

All the new requirements must be in place on or before 1 October 2017, other than

licence variations for limited MDA operators, which have until 1 October 2018 to

apply for an MDA authorisation.

 

Wivell Plater’s message to MDA providers is to start preparing for the new regime

now because the changes impact almost every aspect of MDA services.

 

And for limited MDA operators who will need to vary their licences, while two years

seems like a long time, it can take many months to get an application through.

 

“Limited MDA variations are new, and our experience has been that novel

applications take even longer than usual. So it would be advisable to start soon,”

Wivell Plater says.

 

We believe you should have the flexibility to run your business the way you choose.

Learn about how we can help you to better connect with your clients.

 

Source: http://www.macquarie.com/au/advisers/expertise/smart-practice/a-comprehensiveguide-

to-the-new-mda-rules

Latest Blog

Is your practice in breach of MDA regulatory requirements?
Sometimes It's Okay To Lose
Why you should care about Risk Adjusted Returns?
Do You Consider Your SMSF to Be Diversified?
A Look at The Australian Growth Portfolio — Aristocrat Leisure 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published